<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opposing Orwell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johngordonross.com/life/opposing-orwell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johngordonross.com/life/opposing-orwell/</link>
	<description>A Man for All Reasons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:42:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JohnRoss</title>
		<link>http://johngordonross.com/life/opposing-orwell/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnRoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johngordonross.com/?p=168#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I had deliberately overlooked David Beaver&#039;s treatment of Orwell&#039;s sixth rule, &quot;Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous,&quot; which he considers &quot;even more useless and peculiar than the others.&quot; Mark Liberman (Mr Language Log himself) has clarified that the title &quot;Orwell&#039;s Liar&quot; refers to &quot;the famous &quot;liar paradox&quot;, in which certain kinds of statements about the truth of statements lead to logical paradoxes. His [David Beaver&#039;s] point was that statements about breaking rules can in principle lead to similar problems, and that Orwell&#039;s final writing rule arguably has this problem.&quot; So that&#039;s that sorted out, then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had deliberately overlooked David Beaver&#8217;s treatment of Orwell&#8217;s sixth rule, &#8220;Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous,&#8221; which he considers &#8220;even more useless and peculiar than the others.&#8221; Mark Liberman (Mr Language Log himself) has clarified that the title &#8220;Orwell&#8217;s Liar&#8221; refers to &#8220;the famous &#8220;liar paradox&#8221;, in which certain kinds of statements about the truth of statements lead to logical paradoxes. His [David Beaver's] point was that statements about breaking rules can in principle lead to similar problems, and that Orwell&#8217;s final writing rule arguably has this problem.&#8221; So that&#8217;s that sorted out, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
