<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal and &#8216;Illegal&#8217; Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johngordonross.com/freelancing/legal-and-illegal-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johngordonross.com/freelancing/legal-and-illegal-software/</link>
	<description>A Man for All Reasons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:43:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: christine pook</title>
		<link>http://johngordonross.com/freelancing/legal-and-illegal-software/comment-page-1/#comment-5556</link>
		<dc:creator>christine pook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 16:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johngordonross.com/?p=316#comment-5556</guid>
		<description>Saw a site claiming to sell legal boxed Adobe software quite cheap (hotshopsoft.com).
Comes over as a reliable and genuine company and gives good reasons for its ability to sell cheaply.
How is the general public able to tell legal from illegal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw a site claiming to sell legal boxed Adobe software quite cheap (hotshopsoft.com).<br />
Comes over as a reliable and genuine company and gives good reasons for its ability to sell cheaply.<br />
How is the general public able to tell legal from illegal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
